News
Construction
- [07/28] M/I Homes Reports Second Quarter Results
- [07/28] Vecor Group Green Building Materials: Asian Innovation Award Finalists
- [07/27] Mid-Atlantic Waterproofing Donates $41,000 to Doctors Without Borders
Personal Injury
- [07/30] Mont. officials await test results in bear attack
- [07/30] Inmate sues man he's convicted of burglarizing
- [07/30] 1,200 homes evacuated in LA Co. as fire spreads
Product Liability
- [07/29] Govt to crash test 55 vehicles under new system
- [07/29] Toyota recalls 412,000 cars in US, mostly Avalons
- [07/26] Nap Nanny recliners recalled
Top Headlines
- [07/30] Panel hits Rangel with 13 ethics charges
- [07/30] FBI access to e-mail and Web records raises fears
- [07/30] Ariz. files appeal as sheriff launches new sweep
Case Summaries
Admiralty
[06/25]
Crescent Towing & Salvage Co. v. Chios Beauty MV
In an action for damages sustained when defendant's ship collided with plaintiffs' barges and tugboats during Hurricane Katrina, partial judgment for plaintiff is affirmed in part where the district court did not clearly err in its finding of a predicted "direct hit" on New Orleans by the hurricane, its factual findings based on this finding, and the ultimate finding of negligence to the extent that it relied upon this finding. However, the matter is remanded where the district court needed to enter an order setting the total amount of recovery plaintiffs could recover in rem.
[06/21]
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp.
In an action based on the alleged destruction of goods being shipped, the Ninth Circuit's reversal of the district court's dismissal of the action based on the fact that the parties' contract designated a Tokyo court as the venue for any dispute is reversed where, because the Carmack Amendment does not apply to a shipment originating overseas under a single through bill of lading, the parties' agreement to litigate these cases in Tokyo is binding.
[05/13]
Valladolid v. Pac. Ops. Offshore, LP
In a petition for review of the denial of workers' compensation benefits under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) based on an injury on an offshore drilling platform, the petition is granted in part where: 1) the most natural reading of the OCSLA provided coverage for any injury caused by outer continental shelf operations regardless of where the injury occurred; 2) Congress intended to provide LHWCA coverage regardless of the applicability of state law; and 3) the OCSLA claimant must establish a substantial nexus between the injury and extractive operations on the shelf. However, the petition is denied in part where petitioner was not entitled to LHWCA benefits, on the ground that the drilling platform's use as a convenient dumping ground for scrap metal did not convert it into a maritime situs.
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
